Published
The debt-service limit has dropped to 45%. What that takes away from buyers.
The Bank of Portugal has cut the maximum debt-service ratio it recommends to lenders from 50% to 45%, applying from 1 August 2026. For a household with 2,500€ net, the ceiling on the monthly payment falls from 1,250€ to 1,125€: 125€ a month less. Two things the headline leaves out, and they change the reading: it remains a recommendation rather than law, and up to 10% of each bank's new contracts may still exceed the limit.
What changed, exactly
Macroprudential Recommendation 1/2026, published on 2 July, lowers the debt service-to-income limit (DSTI) from 50% to 45%. It applies to contracts whose solvency assessment is carried out from 1 August 2026, not to the signing date: a file already assessed before then is not reopened.
The exceptions margin tightened too. Banks could lend up to 15% of each half-year's credit above the general limit; that drops to 10%. Within those 10% no ceiling is set, which in practice keeps a door open for cases the rule measures badly.
The stress rate stays, and it is what makes the arithmetic bite harder than it looks: the assessment must simulate a rise in interest rates of 0.5 percentage points for terms up to 5 years, 1 point between 5 and 10 years, and 1.5 points above 10 years. A 30-year loan is assessed against a payment that does not exist today.
What it is worth in euros
The debt-service ratio is the share of net income that goes to loan payments. Cutting five points off the limit cuts five points of the income available for that calculation.
For a household with 2,500€ net a month, the ceiling moves from 1,250€ to 1,125€. That is 125€ a month, and it is not 125€ saved: it is 125€ of ceiling. Translated into capital, and depending on term and rate, it typically removes tens of thousands of euros from what the bank will lend.
One point almost nobody makes: the payment that counts against this rule is not the one you will pay, it is the one produced by the stress rate above. Anyone running the numbers on the real payment ends up with an optimistic figure.
The change that went unnoticed
The same recommendation changed maximum terms, and for many buyers that weighs as much as the five points. Borrowers aged 35 or under can take up to 40 years; above 35, the maximum term is 35 years.
Term is the most direct lever on the monthly payment, so part of the DSTI tightening is offset for those still inside the younger bracket, and is not offset for those who are not.
The market this lands in
The tightening arrives in a market that had been accelerating. According to INE, house prices rose 17.6% in 2025, the largest annual average change since the index began in 2009. The rise was stronger for existing homes, 18.9%, than for new ones, 14.2%. Some market analysis puts the rise at around 24%; the INE figure is the official index, and it is the one used here.
In the same year 169,812 homes were sold, 8.6% more than in 2024, for a total of 41.2 billion euros. For 2026 the sector expects close to 160,000 transactions, fewer than in 2025: a year of adjustment, not acceleration.
And dependence on credit rose with prices. In 2017-2021, 48% of purchases used a mortgage; in 2024 it was 52%; in 2025, 56%. More than half the market now passes through the rule that has just tightened.
In short: less borrowing capacity, against prices that rose nearly 18% in a year, in a market where more than half of purchases depend on the bank. It is that scissor the buyer feels, not either half on its own.
Where purchases stall
A study by UCI with SPIRITUC, surveying 733 professionals registered with the Bank of Portugal, gives the measure of time: between first contact and the deed, 31 to 60 days for 55.3% of respondents, and 61 to 90 days for 38.1%. Together, more than nine in ten purchases take between one and three months.
And when a purchase does NOT reach the deed, the main cause cited is the operation being unviable, named by 41.9% of professionals. The second is the client not finding a property, at 29.2%.
This one is worth reading carefully, because it circulates badly misread: the study does not say 42% of operations fail. It says that among those that do, unviability is the most cited reason.
What this changes in the work
With less slack at every step, the cost of a mistake rises. An offer made before capacity has been confirmed against the stress rate, a preliminary contract signed with deadlines the bank cannot meet, or a property whose valuation comes in below the price, stop being setbacks and become lost purchases.
We guide every buyer through eight stages, from intake and qualification to after-sales, and it is in the stages between viewing and signing that most purchases stall. We represent the buyer only, from the first conversation to the deed, at no cost to the client.
Sources
- Banco de Portugal · Recomendação Macroprudencial n.º 1/2026
- Banco de Portugal · comunicado da revisão
- Jornal Económico · o limite passa a 45% e a taxa de stress mantém-se
- INE · Índice de Preços da Habitação, 2025
- Vida Imobiliária · Habitação é o setor estrela de 2026, mas ajustes são inevitáveis
- idealista/news · estudo UCI e SPIRITUC sobre intermediação de crédito